Langzhong is one of China’s historic towns, a city shaped by its ancient urban fabric, its relationship with the Jialing River and the continuity of architectural traditions that date back to the Ming and Qing dynasties. Its streets, roofs, courtyards and thresholds form a dense spatial culture in which architecture is never isolated. Buildings belong to sequences, to alignments, to the rhythm of the street and to the gradual passage from public life to domestic interior.
The project begins from this condition. Located at the edge of the ancient town, the plot occupies a precise threshold between the historic city and its contemporary extension. It is close enough to participate in the memory of Langzhong, yet open enough to define a new architectural presence.
The proposal does not reproduce the traditional city as image. It studies its underlying order: symmetry, modularity, material depth, privacy gradients and the role of courtyards as spaces of transition. From these principles, the building establishes a contemporary language rooted in the place.
The project occupies a threshold between the ancient city and its contemporary continuation.




The programme is organized as a gradual transition from public to private. Along the main pedestrian street, where the urban activity is most intense, the restaurant and principal access establish the building’s public face. Here, the project opens to the city.
Further inside, the intensity changes. Tea rooms, spa and gathering spaces form an intermediate layer, neither fully public nor domestic. Beyond this condition, the private houses are placed deeper within the plot, protected by courtyards, gardens and planted filters. Privacy is not produced by separation alone, but by sequence, distance and light.
Privacy is built through depth, not enclosure.Txema García Ballester — Principal Architect
The project approaches traditional Chinese architecture as a spatial system rather than an image. From it, the design takes symmetry as an ordering structure, modular repetition as a constructive measure, and the courtyard as a device for privacy and transition.
The module organizes rooms, dining areas, structure and services. Repeated elements establish a clear rhythm in plan and façade, while singular spaces appear at corners and moments of transition. This allows the building to remain legible as one architectural body despite the complexity of its programme: restaurant, hospitality, semi-public spaces and three private houses.
Technical bands concentrate services, protect the main rooms from the street and separate the different fields of use. Construction becomes a way of ordering interior life.
The module is not a formal device. It is the measure through which the building is organized.




The materiality of the project begins with a local reference: the grooved stone of Langzhong. On the exterior, this condition is reinterpreted through finely carved stone surfaces that establish continuity with local tradition without copying it literally.
Inside, the same logic is transferred to wood. The lines of the stone become profiles, screens and linings that introduce depth, shadow and a more domestic scale. The relationship between both materials creates continuity between exterior and interior while changing the temperature of the space.
The section completes this operation. The entrance is raised slightly above the street before leading down toward a main hall set below street level. This adjustment resolves the relationship with regulation, improves the interior height and produces a slower, more measured arrival. The building is not understood from a single façade, but through a sequence of thresholds, courtyards, light and matter.
Stone carries the memory of the city. Wood brings that memory into the scale of the body.



Langzhong is not treated as a backdrop. It is the project’s first material. Its urban memory, its sequence of thresholds, its courtyards, roofs and stone surfaces define the terms within which the architecture operates.
The proposal does not seek contrast for its own sake, nor does it attempt to dissolve itself into the historic fabric. It occupies a more precise position: to continue the city without replicating it. The building accepts the discipline of the place, its measure, its rhythm, its relationship between public and private, and works from those conditions toward a contemporary form of permanence.
In this sense, the project is not an object added to Langzhong.
It is a calibrated continuation of its spatial culture.