A house on the Red Sea coast at El Gouna, conceived for a family that returns across the seasons and across generations. Not a holiday villa but a permanent setting: a building that holds the life of a family when it is present, and holds its own dignity when it is not. The site faces two opposite conditions — to the northeast the open sea and the long horizon, to the southwest a road and the low, dense fabric of the town — and the tension between the two responses is the foundation of the design. The house is built to be true to two states at once: full and empty, open and closed.


The house has two faces because the site has two conditions. They are not front and back, but two different responses to two different realities, and the tension between them is the argument of the project. A closed face gives weight to an open one; an open face releases the pressure of the closed one. The line between them is the central axis.


To the road, the house presents a continuous wall, forty-five metres long and two storeys high, with a single opening on the axis. It protects the interior from the afternoon sun, the dust and the noise, and it is the most worked surface in the project, not a back. Behind it the rooms turn inward, each opening onto a private patio rather than the street. The openness is generous, and the privacy is complete.
The house descends from Hassan Fathy’s lesson at New Gourna in 1946 — that the intelligence of Egyptian building already lives in its response to climate: the mass wall, the courtyard, the deep threshold, and that the architect’s task is not to invent but to remember. Mud brick belongs to the Nile valley, not the Red Sea coast; here the same principles are carried in concrete block, stone and lime mortar. The primary instrument is the wall, not the machine.
To the sea, the same house opens completely. The threshold is a gradient, not a line: room, covered terrace, pool deck, sand, water. The relationship is set room by room — where the room is made for the horizon a full glazed wall dissolves into it; elsewhere the sea is held at a measured distance, or reduced to a precise vertical incision.


A single axis runs from the entrance on the southwest to the sea on the northeast, and the rooms distribute in mirror on either side: two wings of equal weight, equal programme, equal proportion. The helical stair holds the centre. The symmetry is structural, not decorative — a principle, not a style.


The relationship to the sea is not uniform. In the living room a full glazed wall frames the horizon at the height of a seated figure, so architecture and landscape compose into a single image. At the cinema the sea is rationed to a narrow vertical slit framed in dark mass. A fragment of horizon, precisely cut, communicates more than a panorama.
The architecture withdraws so that the sea can occupy the foreground.


Where a room is not given the whole horizon, the house makes an incision. A single precise cut — narrow, vertical, deep — captures more of the landscape than an open glazed wall, because it fixes a point of view. It is a question of perspective: the cut decides where you stand and what you see, and turns a fragment of sea or sky into an event. It is an old instinct — the line scored across a desert to seize the whole plain, the wall slotted to hold the horizon. At the cinema the sea enters this way, rationed to a vertical sliver framed in dark mass.




The closed wall is finished in hand-applied lime mortar, pigmented with iron oxide so the colour runs through the body of the material rather than over its surface. Its hand-scored vertical grooves drain the desert dust, water and salt, and register the sun across the day. The lime keeps hardening for decades. The wall is built to look better in forty years than on the day it is finished.



The interior is built in two tonal families, one darker and one lighter, and the same logic runs through both: travertine in chocolate and in Ocean Blue, lime in wet sand and dry sand, and linen in two colours. These are not two palettes but one, read at two depths. Outside, the house is monochrome, a single tone held from the entrance to the sea.



The house takes a deliberate position. It is not a landmark, though it is built at a scale that would allow one, and it does not imitate the styles the resort has accumulated. It takes from Egypt what is fundamental — the mass wall, the courtyard, the response to the sun, the colour of the earth — as method rather than quotation. A serious house, built with care, for a family that will return.
More on how the studio approaches work of this kind:
Working in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf